Page last updated [DATE]Print as of [DATE]
Map
[Map image: assets/lines-of-control.jpg]Lines of Control
Who actually holds the ground: occupied territory, breakaway states, buffer zones, active fronts and areas run by armed groups, drawn over the recognized borders.
Data
| Area | Who holds it | Since | Status | Evidence date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Europe and post-Soviet space: regional lines · 12 | |||||
Crimea and SevastopolNoteRetain Ukraine’s internationally recognized border and show the Russian occupation as an overlay. | Russia | Feb to Mar 2014 | Frozen control within an active war | 9 Nov 2026 terrain map | ISW terrain assessment |
Russian held mainland UkraineNoteTrace ISW’s dated control line. Russia claims the entirety of several oblasts that its forces only partly occupy. | Russian forces in portions of eastern and southern Ukraine and northern border sectors | Parts since 2014. Major changes since Feb 2022. | Active and contested | 9 to 10 Nov 2026 | ISW terrain maps ISW assessment via Kyiv Post |
Russo Ukrainian front and border sectorsNoteDistinguish assessed control, claims and infiltration. Recheck former Ukrainian positions inside Russia, including Kursk, before using an older outline. | Russian and Ukrainian forces along shifting lines | Full scale war since Feb 2022 | Active and contested | Nov 2026 terrain assessments | ISW map room |
AbkhaziaNoteGeorgia’s recognized territory includes Abkhazia. The de facto authorities administer the breakaway territory. | Abkhaz de facto authorities backed by Russian forces | 1992 to 1993. Expanded in 2008. | Frozen and contested | EU policy checked 11 Nov 2026 | Council of the EU Georgia policy EU relations assessment |
South Ossetia or Tskhinvali regionNoteGeorgia’s recognized territory includes South Ossetia. Fences, posts and other changes along the administrative boundary require a local inset. | South Ossetian de facto authorities and Russian forces | 1991 to 1992. Expanded in 2008. | Frozen and contested | 18 Sep 2026 statement | Council of the EU statement |
Transnistria and Bender or TighinaNoteThe control line crosses the Dniester. Tiraspol administers Bender on the west bank. Chișinău administers some east bank villages, including Cocieri and Molovata Nouă. | Tiraspol de facto authorities with Russian military presence | 1990 to 1992 | Frozen and contested | Jan and Sep 2026 reporting | OSCE Mission to Moldova Moldova Joint Control Commission account |
Dniester Security ZoneNoteLabel the security arrangements and identify local authorities separately. Checkpoint control can differ from village administration. | Joint security arrangements involving Moldovan, Russian and Transnistrian contingents | Jul 1992 | Frozen and contested | 15 Jan 2026 commission meeting | Moldova Joint Control Commission account |
KosovoNoteRecognition is divided. Northern Kosovo has Serbian political and community institutions alongside Kosovo’s state structures. The evidence does not establish a separate Serbian controlled state there. | Kosovo institutions. NATO’s KFOR has a security role. | Outside effective Belgrade administration since 1999. Independence declared in 2008. | Frozen and contested sovereignty | 10 Nov 2026 update | NATO role in Kosovo |
Northern CyprusNoteShow the main northern zone, Kokkina enclave and the fenced part of Varosha at appropriate scales. Varosha has a distinct military control history. | Turkish Cypriot authorities and Turkish forces | 1974. Northern administration declared independence in 1983. | Frozen and contested | 2026 UN mandate | UNFICYP buffer geography UN Security Council Resolution 2815 |
Cyprus Green Line buffer zoneNoteUse both ceasefire lines. The UN calls for restoration of the pre June 2000 military situation at Strovilia. Separate village use, ceasefire lines and military positions. | UNFICYP monitors and regulates the buffer zone. Civilian use continues in parts. | Present ceasefire alignment 1974 | Frozen with local disputes | 2026 UN mandate | UNFICYP buffer geography UN Security Council Resolution 2815 |
Armenia Azerbaijan border positions outside the claimed alignmentNoteParcels depend on the applicable Soviet map and completed delimitation. Separate the enclave rows and the four non enclave villages transferred to Azerbaijan in 2024. | Azerbaijani positions inside territory Armenia identifies as Armenian, plus smaller opposite side anomalies | Especially 2021 to 2022 | Contested | 2025 survey. November 2026 footprint unverified. | CivilNet territorial survey Initialed Armenia Azerbaijan agreement CFR border chronology |
GibraltarNoteUse a disputed sovereignty label. Gibraltar appears on the UN list of Non Self Governing Territories. | United Kingdom and Gibraltar institutions. Spain disputes sovereignty. | British control 1704. Treaty 1713. | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | UN administering power entry | UN decolonization profile |
| Middle East and Africa: regional lines · 37 | |||||
West Bank including East JerusalemNoteAreas A, B and C describe different administrative and security arrangements. East Jerusalem requires a distinct label within the occupied territory. | Israel exercises occupation authority. The Palestinian Authority administers parts of the West Bank. | Occupation since 1967. Oslo divisions in the 1990s. | Active and contested | Dec 2025 access map. Oct 2026 reporting. | UN OCHA West Bank access map OCHA situation report |
Gaza Strip and internal separation linesNoteThe UN commission assessed at least 60 percent under Israeli control on 2 September. The original 53 percent was a ceasefire allocation. The later Orange Line describes access restrictions and requires a separate symbol. | Israeli forces in military held sectors. Palestinian de facto authorities and armed actors elsewhere. | Hamas administration since 2007. Ground changes since 2023. Yellow Line since Oct 2025. | Active and contested | 2 Sep 2026 assessment. Changes reported in Oct. | UN Commission of Inquiry OCHA situation report |
Israeli occupied Golan HeightsNoteSeparate the long held Golan from Israeli positions established beyond the UNDOF separation line after December 2024. | Israel | 1967 | Frozen and contested sovereignty | Spring 2026 security reporting | EUAA Quneitra control |
UNDOF separation area and southern Syrian positionsNoteA verified position or patrol route describes military presence at that location. A civilian administration boundary requires additional evidence. | Israeli forces at positions within and beyond the UN monitored area. Syrian government elsewhere. | Dec 2024 onward | Active and contested | Spring 2026 reporting | EUAA Quneitra control |
Southern Lebanon belt and positionsNoteThe earlier UN reference to five positions describes an older arrangement. The November CRS assessment reports a broader buffer and additional fortified positions. See the local entries for Ghajar, Shebaa Farms and Kfar Shuba. | Israeli forces in areas beyond the Blue Line | Renewed incursions in 2024. Further changes in 2026. | Active and contested | 9 Nov 2026 assessment | CRS Lebanon assessment UN Security Council Resolution 2790 |
Northeastern Syria Kurdish and SDF areasNoteEUAA reports significant losses to the transitional government in early 2026. Kobane and remaining Kurdish areas need location specific verification because local administration and military deployments changed at different times. | Residual SDF and local Kurdish authority alongside expanding transitional government authority and integration | Kurdish administration from 2012. Major contraction in Jan 2026. | Contested | Jan to spring 2026 reporting | EUAA SDF territorial control |
Suwayda or SweidaNoteDistinguish Druze held central and southern areas from government held approaches and sectors. | Druze authorities and armed groups including National Guard structures. Transitional government in other parts. | Local autonomy predates 2024. Consolidation in 2025. | Active and contested | Spring 2026 control reporting | EUAA Sweida control |
Turkish military sites in northern SyriaNoteVerify the November installation footprint. Older maps of Syrian National Army areas indicate a different date and kind of authority. | Turkish forces at installations. Local civilian and transitional government authority varies. | Operations since 2016 | Contested | 31 Jan 2026 areas of influence map | EUAA and UN areas of influence |
Turkish military sites in northern IraqNoteTrack the actual handover date separately from the agreement. Map installations at site scale. | Turkish military at specific sites, including Bashiqa Zilkan pending handover | Dates vary. Bashiqa since 2015. | Contested transition | 11 Nov 2026 withdrawal reporting | Breaking Defense handover assessment |
Houthi held YemenNoteThe coastal and southern fronts have changed. Use the latest verified control line for individual sectors. | Ansar Allah or Houthi authorities in Sana’a and much of the northwest | Sana’a seized in Sep 2014. Expansion in 2015. | Active and contested | Oct 2026 briefing | UK Parliament Yemen briefing |
Yemen areas held by anti Houthi forcesNoteThe Southern Transitional Council’s January 2026 territorial reversal supersedes its older southern control outline. | Presidential Leadership Council and associated forces | Fragmented since 2015. Reordered in 2026. | Active and contested | Oct 2026 briefing | UK Parliament Yemen briefing |
Libya east south and westNoteLocal armed groups exercise authority within both broad zones. Label the Sirte area line and the limits of the reported zones of influence. | LAAF and eastern administration in the east and much of the south. Tripoli GNU and western coalitions in the west. | Rival governments from 2014. Main ceasefire alignment in 2020. | Frozen main line with local fighting | Jul 2026 assessment | CRS Libya assessment |
Zawiya and western Libyan militia localitiesNoteCoercive and economic authority overlaps with formal state functions. Depict the locality and verified positions at urban scale. | Rival local armed groups, some formally affiliated with the state | Post 2011. Alliances vary. | Active and contested | Aug 2026 reporting | ACLED Zawiya assessment |
Western Sahara west and north of the bermNoteDepict Morocco’s control alongside Western Sahara’s disputed sovereignty and UN decolonization status. | Morocco controls the main cities and coastline | 1975 to 1979. Berm consolidated in the 1980s. | Contested and intermittently active | 4 Nov 2026 reporting | Reuters on ceasefire and control UN list of Non Self Governing Territories |
Western Sahara east and south of the bermNoteThe refugee camps near Tindouf are across the border in Algeria. Keep them geographically distinct from Polisario operations east of the berm. | Polisario and SADR operational and administrative areas | Berm era division. Hostilities renewed in 2020. | Active and contested | 4 Nov 2026 reporting | Reuters on ceasefire and control |
Somaliland actual controlNoteUse the held territory rather than the full former British Somaliland outline. Israel formally recognized Somaliland in December 2025. | Somaliland government | 1991 | Frozen in the core. Contested in the east. | Mar 2026 control map | EUAA eastern control assessment Reuters recognition report |
Sool Sanaag Cayn and Northeastern State interfaceNoteNortheastern State claims more territory than it controls. The source differentiates Laas Caanood and eastern Sool from mixed sectors and limited presence in Sanaag. | Northeastern State or SSC derived forces, Somaliland and Puntland in different sectors | Las Anod reversal Aug 2023. State formation Jul 2025. | Contested with local fighting | 31 Mar 2026 control map | EUAA Sool and Northeastern State |
South central Somalia held by Al ShabaabNoteShadow taxation extends outside directly held areas. Use town records and the dated control map for local distinctions. | Al Shabaab in rural areas and towns including Jilib. Government and allied garrisons interrupt those areas. | Evolving since the mid 2000s | Active and contested | 31 Mar 2026 control map | EUAA Al Shabaab control and influence EUAA Somalia control maps |
RSF held parts of Darfur Kordofan and northern SudanNoteThe mapped area includes much of Darfur, West Kordofan and the northern supply corridor, with important exceptions. Refresh the front lines before print. | Rapid Support Forces and allies | War began Apr 2023. Local captures vary. | Active and contested | 31 Aug 2026 map | EUAA Sudan control map |
Jebel MarraNotePreserve this distinct area within Darfur. | Sudan Liberation Movement Abdul Wahid faction in its core mountain territory | Darfur war era from 2003 | Contested with surrounding fighting | 31 Aug 2026 map | EUAA Sudan control map |
Nuba Mountains and parts of Blue NileNoteDistinguish independent SPLM N control from RSF allied or contested sectors. | SPLM N al Hilu and associated forces. RSF allies share or contest some sectors. | Renewed war from 2011. Alliance changes in 2025 and 2026. | Active and contested | 31 Aug 2026 map | EUAA Sudan control map |
AbyeiNoteIdentify distinct military and policing footprints within the disputed area. UNISFA deployment does not establish exclusive administration. | UNISFA monitors the area. RSF linked elements are present in the north and South Sudanese personnel in the south. | Disputed since South Sudan’s 2011 independence | Active and contested | Oct to Nov 2026 reporting | EUAA Abyei actors Security Council Report |
South Sudan opposition held pocketsNoteConfirm each locality and the observation date. The report identifies several areas where access was restricted because of reported opposition control or presence. | SPLA IO and allied or local forces in parts of Jonglei, Upper Nile and elsewhere | Civil war since 2013. Changes in 2025 and 2026. | Active and contested | Jun 2026 access and conflict reporting | FEWS NET outlook |
Halaib Triangle and Wadi Halfa salientNoteShow the interstate boundary dispute separately from Sudan’s civil war. Competing colonial alignments also explain Bir Tawil’s unusual status. | Egypt. Sudan disputes sovereignty. | Egyptian consolidation in Halaib during the 1990s through 2000 | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | Oct 2026 reporting on Halaib | EUAA Red Sea control National Geographic map policy |
Al FashagaNoteDistinguish military posts, disputed farmland and competing border alignments. | Predominantly Sudanese military control. Ethiopian incursions and competing boundary interpretations. | Major Sudanese takeover from late 2020 | Contested with intermittent fighting | Oct 2026 conflict update | Chatham House border study EUAA Gedaref update |
Western Tigray and Eritrean held border pocketsNoteKeep the internal regional boundary and the international boundary distinct. Verify individual Eritrean positions before drawing a solid area. | Amhara forces in disputed western Tigray. Eritrean forces in some Ethiopian border areas. | 2020 to 2021 | Active and contested | 6 Nov 2026 assessment | CRS Ethiopia assessment |
Other contested parts of Tigray Amhara and OromiaNoteUse local control or contested points. Whole region fills would conceal federal positions and changing authority. | TDF and TPLF, Fano and OLA respectively, with different political relationships and rural footholds | Dates vary. Fano conflict especially since 2023. | Active and contested | Oct to 9 Nov 2026 reporting | UK Home Office Ethiopia assessment CFR Ethiopia tracker |
AFC M23 held eastern DR CongoNoteConfirm current held towns and lines. Uvira was captured in December 2025 and the FCDO reports withdrawal in January 2026. | AFC M23 supported by and operating alongside Rwandan forces. Includes Goma, Bukavu and surrounding areas. | Expansion from 2022. Goma and Bukavu captured in 2025. | Active and contested | Oct 2026 and live FCDO reporting | UK FCDO DR Congo advice Security Council Report |
JNIM areas in Mali Burkina Faso and neighboring borderlandsNoteDisaggregate held sites, areas subject to taxation, besieged towns and reported movement corridors. | JNIM and affiliates exercise varying rural administration, taxation and access control | Expansion from 2012 to 2017 onward | Active and contested | 10 to 11 Nov 2026 reporting | ACLED Sahel updates ACLED JNIM profile |
Islamic State Sahel zonesNoteInterfaces with state forces and JNIM shift. Confirm sites separately from reported operations. | IS Sahel or ISSP, especially along the Mali Niger borderlands | Expansion from the mid 2010s | Active and contested | 10 to 11 Nov 2026 reporting | ACLED Sahel updates |
Lake Chad basin and northeastern NigeriaNoteState held towns interrupt insurgent control. The factions’ operating regions exceed their verified held areas. | ISWAP and JAS or Boko Haram in distinct rural, island and forest zones | Insurgency from 2009. Territorial phases from 2013 to 2014. | Active and contested | EUAA reference period preceding Jan 2026 | EUAA Nigerian armed actors |
Ceuta and MelillaNoteSpanish autonomous cities. See the coastal detail for smaller nearby possessions. | Spain. Morocco claims the cities. | Melilla since 1497. Ceuta under Spanish crown since 1580. | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | 2026 briefing | UK Parliament Ceuta briefing |
MayotteNoteFrance cites local votes in favor of remaining French. Attribute France’s legal characterization to its government. | France. Comoros claims the island. | French administration from 1841. Separation disputed since 1975. | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | 2025 French position | French Ministry of Foreign Affairs |
Europa Bassas da India Juan de Nova Glorieuses and TromelinNoteShow island or reef points at world scale. The sovereignty claims are distinct from maritime zones. | France. Madagascar claims the first four. Mauritius claims Tromelin. | Varying colonial era dates. Current TAAF administration. | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | Live French agency pages | CNES geographic assessment TAAF administration |
Chagos Archipelago and Diego GarciaNoteThe UK and Mauritius signed a transfer treaty in 2025. The October 2026 briefing says it had yet to enter into force. | United Kingdom administers. Joint UK and US base on Diego Garcia. | BIOT established in 1965. Base since early 1970s. | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | Oct 2026 treaty status | UK Parliament Chagos and international law |
Abu Musa Greater Tunb and Lesser TunbNoteMap the three islands separately at inset scale. Military installations and maritime access are distinct layers. | Iran. United Arab Emirates claims the islands. | 1971. Abu Musa has a distinct administrative history. | Disputed sovereignty with active regional conflict | 16 Jul 2026 reporting | AP via Washington Post |
Ilemi TriangleNoteKeep the claim lines and verified administrative reach separate. The source does not support a single current controller for the entire triangle. | Kenya and South Sudan exercise divided or limited control in the cited account. | Longstanding | Contested boundary | Cartographic reference. Current local footprint unverified. | National Geographic map policy |
| Asia and the Americas: regional lines · 31 | |||||
Taiwan Penghu Kinmen and MatsuNoteRecognition and sovereignty positions vary. Map Taiwan’s separately administered islands, including those off the mainland coast. | Republic of China or Taiwan government | ROC administration of Taiwan and Penghu from 1945. Separate cross Strait government from 1949. | Frozen and contested sovereignty | Aug 2026 CRS assessment | CRS Taiwan background |
Indian and Pakistani administered KashmirNoteThe LoC separates areas under different administrations in disputed territory. | India south and east of the LoC. Pakistan administers Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan. | Partition era control from 1947 to 1949. LoC arrangement since 1972. | Contested with episodic fighting | Nov 2026 map | CFR India Pakistan tracker and map |
Siachen and Saltoro sectorNoteShow the Actual Ground Position Line separately from the LoC. | India holds the principal glacier and ridge positions. Pakistan holds positions to the west. | 1984 | Frozen and contested | 2025 advisory and Nov 2026 map | US State Department Karakoram advisory CFR Kashmir map |
Aksai Chin and Trans Karakoram or Shaksgam tractNoteIndia rejects the 1963 agreement. Treat Aksai Chin and Shaksgam as distinct areas. | China. India claims both. | Chinese consolidation from the 1950s to 1962. Pakistan China agreement on Shaksgam in 1963. | Frozen and contested sovereignty | Nov 2026 map | CFR Kashmir map |
India China Line of Actual Control and disengagement areasNoteDisengagement agreements constrain patrols in specific places. The two governments provide different boundary interpretations and no common complete map of the LAC. | Indian and Chinese forces on their respective sides. Local patrol restrictions vary. | Longstanding. Major changes from 2020. | Contested | Aug 2026 bilateral talks | Indian government WMCC account Chinese MFA talks outcomes |
China Bhutan disputed sectorsNoteDoklam and northern valleys require independent parcel and imagery checks. Claim boundaries exceed verified infrastructure footprints. | Chinese settlements, roads and facilities in parts of disputed terrain. Bhutan administers other areas. | Incremental. Substantial construction since the 2010s. | Contested | 10 Nov 2026 reporting | The Diplomat border reporting |
Korean DMZ and Military Demarcation LineNoteThe Military Demarcation Line and the demilitarized strip are separate cartographic features. Administration and monitoring follow the armistice. | DPRK to the north. ROK and United Nations Command arrangements to the south. | 1953 armistice | Frozen and contested | 23 Jun 2026 fact sheet | UN Command DMZ fact sheet |
Southern Kurils or Northern TerritoriesNoteUse both naming conventions where space permits. Attribute the legal position to the claimant government. | Russia. Japan claims Iturup, Kunashir, Shikotan and Habomai. | Soviet seizure in 1945. Russian succession in 1991. | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | Aug 2026 Japanese statement | Japanese MFA Northern Territories Japanese government statement |
Senkaku or Diaoyu IslandsNoteCoast guard activity in surrounding waters is separate from administration of the islands. | Japan administers. China and Taiwan claim. | Japanese administration restored in 1972 | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | Japanese MFA administrative description | Japanese MFA Senkaku administration |
Dokdo or TakeshimaNoteSouth Korean government sources document security personnel and residents. Legal claims should be attributed. | South Korea. Japan claims the rocks. | South Korean possession consolidated in the 1950s | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | Oct 2026 staffing and residence | ROK MFA administration ROK MFA residents and staff |
Paracel IslandsNoteThe feature register lists the 20 AMTI entries. The group control date and individual outpost dates differ. | China. Vietnam and Taiwan claim the island group. | China held the entire group from 1974 | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | Aug 2026 assessment | CRS South China Sea assessment AMTI China feature index |
Spratly Islands occupied featuresNotePlot each occupied feature from the feature register. Reclaimed land, reefs and submerged features have different legal and physical characteristics. | China, Malaysia, Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam hold different features | Varies by site. Mainly 1950s through 1990s. | Contested sovereignty and access | Aug 2026 assessment and AMTI index | CRS South China Sea assessment AMTI Island Tracker |
Thailand Cambodia disputed border positionsNoteCambodia alleges Thai occupation across the frontier. Thailand says it retained ceasefire positions and disputes the occupation characterization. | Thai and Cambodian forces in disputed sectors | Major changes during 2025 fighting | Contested | Feb 2026 reporting. November positions unverified. | Reuters on competing accounts Cambodian letter circulated at UN |
Rakhine and Paletwa in MyanmarNoteMark changing front lines around town and island positions. Claims about control of the whole Ngapyi Island differ from reporting on Alel village. | Arakan Army holds many captured areas. Government retains Sittwe, Kyaukphyu and Manaung sectors. | Major current expansion since Nov 2023 | Active and contested | 5 Nov 2026 reporting | DVB counteroffensive reporting |
Northern and southern Wa territoriesNoteSouthern Wa is geographically separate. Some administered territory extends beyond the constitutionally designated area. | UWSP and UWSA parallel administration | Northern core from 1989. Southern expansion later. | Frozen and contested | 2026 parallel administration update | ISP Myanmar Wa administration ISP Myanmar parallel administrations |
Mong La or Special Region FourNoteMong La operates a separate administration within Myanmar’s international border. | National Democratic Alliance Army parallel administration | 1989 | Frozen and contested | 2026 parallel administration update | ISP Myanmar parallel administrations |
Kokang Ta’ang Shan and Kachin areasNoteIdentify separate organizations and negotiated handovers. Lashio and other areas changed hands, so the older Operation 1027 lines require revision. | MNDAA, TNLA, KIA, SSPP, RCSS, Pa O organizations and other groups in distinct areas | Longstanding enclaves. Major changes from 2023 to 2026. | Active and contested | 2026 administrative and recapture reports | ISP Myanmar parallel administrations Myanmar Peace Monitor town recaptures |
Chin Karenni Karen Mon Bago Tanintharyi and central MyanmarNoteUse actor specific control areas. November claims that the military captured multiple bases near Mon and Bago lacked independent verification. | Ethnic armed organizations, People’s Defence Forces and local resistance administrations interspersed with government positions | Longstanding insurgencies. Extensive changes since 2021. | Active and contested | ACLED data through Jul 2026. Nov battlefield reporting. | ACLED Myanmar outlook AP battlefield reporting |
Afghanistan Pakistan border fighting sectorsNoteSeparate cross border incidents from established holds. Reuters could not independently verify claims of captured posts. | Afghan Taliban and Pakistani forces. Claimed captures disputed. | Renewed clashes in 2025 and 2026 | Active and contested | Feb and Oct 2026 reporting | Reuters Feb account Reuters Oct update |
Port au Prince metropolitan gang areasNoteUse neighborhood and corridor evidence. The UN panel describes security gains and continued gang authority on key routes. | Multiple gangs and fractured Viv Ansanm networks, interrupted by police and security held areas | Longstanding. Rapid expansion from 2021 to 2025 and shifts in 2026. | Active and contested | Apr to Jul 2026 reporting | BINUH quarterly findings UN panel report S/2026/714 |
Lower Artibonite and Centre in HaitiNoteMirebalais and Saut d’Eau have separate local records. Reported attacks in the South East establish a presence or raid at specific locations. | Gran Grif, Kokorat San Ras, Canaan, 400 Mawozo and other groups in different places | Locality specific. Expansion in 2023 to 2026. | Active and contested | First half of 2026 | BINUH quarterly findings |
Colombia armed group areasNoteMajor areas include Catatumbo, Arauca, the Pacific belt, Bajo Cauca, southern Bolívar and southern and eastern rural zones. EUAA lists 13 principal areas of dispute. Municipality presence counts do not delimit held territory. | ELN, AGC or EGC, FARC dissident factions and other groups with overlapping authority | ELN from the 1960s. AGC from 2006. Dissident expansion after 2016. | Active and contested | Apr 2026 synthesis. Much underlying data is from 2025. | EUAA main areas of dispute |
Venezuelan corridors along ColombiaNoteSome corridors involve parallel authority, illicit taxation and overlapping state security operations. | ELN and FARC dissidents alongside or tolerated by state actors in some locations | Longstanding. Expansion in the 2010s. | Active and contested | Jul 2026 reporting | EUAA ELN in Venezuela EUAA FARC dissidents |
Bolívar and Amazonas mining enclavesNoteMap documented mines and surrounding governance at local scale. Regional presence numbers are broader than any single actor’s hold. | Armed mining organizations, ELN, dissidents and local criminal groups, often intertwined with security officials | Varies by site. Especially since the 2010s. | Active and contested | Jul and Sep 2026 reporting | EUAA Venezuela mining security IACHR and REDESCA statement SOS Orinoco study |
Sinaloa criminal governance localitiesNoteMap verified turf and governance where local evidence supports it. The report covers Sinaloa and distinguishes urban state operations from shifting rural disputes. | Rival Sinaloa cartel factions with continuing state presence | Current factional war from Sep 2024 | Active and contested | Jul 2026 field assessment | International Crisis Group Sinaloa report |
Rio metropolitan gang and militia territoriesNoteGENI and Fogo Cruzado distinguish sustained control from intermittent influence. Keep the data vintage visible and check later changes before using a November 2026 label. | Comando Vermelho, Terceiro Comando Puro, militias and other groups | Decades. Dataset begins in 2007. | Active and contested | Underlying maps through 2024 | GENI and Fogo Cruzado map update Fogo Cruzado methods and results |
Eastern Ankoko or Anacoco IslandNoteIsolate this physical possession dispute from the broader Guyanese administered Essequibo claim. | Venezuela occupies the portion Guyana identifies as Guyanese territory | 1966 | Frozen and contested | May 2026 Guyanese submission | Guyana government summary of ICJ submissions |
Falkland Islands or Islas MalvinasNoteThe UN lists the territory as Non Self Governing and identifies the UK as administering power. | United Kingdom and Falkland Islands government. Argentina claims sovereignty. | 1833. Interrupted Apr to Jun 1982. | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | 10 Nov 2026 briefing | UK Parliament Falkland Islands briefing UN Falkland Islands profile |
Guantánamo Bay naval baseNoteShow the leased base as a special jurisdiction. | United States exercises jurisdiction and control. Cuba retains sovereignty under the lease language and opposes the lease. | 1903. Treaty framework from 1934. | Frozen and disputed lease | Legal baseline from CRS | CRS naval station and lease |
Essequibo outside the Ankoko issueNoteThe ICJ provisional measures refer to the area Guyana administers and exercises control over. The Venezuelan claim line is distinct from actual control. | Guyana administers. Venezuela claims. | Guyanese independence in 1966 following British administration | Disputed sovereignty | Jun 2026 ICJ case reporting | Guyana government summary of ICJ measures |
New River or Tigri TriangleNoteAttribute Guyana’s legal position and show the disputed boundary alignment. | Guyana. Suriname claims. | Guyanese possession consolidated in 1969 | Frozen and disputed sovereignty | 2025 claimant government statement | Guyana Ministry of Foreign Affairs |
| Europe and post-Soviet space: local sites · 12 | |||||
Olivenza / OlivençaNotePortugal disputes title. Spanish municipal administration is clear. Use the sourced extent of the claim rather than guessing it from the town boundary. | Spain | 1801 | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | 2024-09-28 reporting | El País, border town and Portuguese claim |
Gornja Siga, DanubeNoteThe court records a Croatian inspection. It expressly declines to determine the interstate boundary. The self-proclaimed Liberland claim provides no evidence of effective state control. | Croatian border police and inspectors exercised authority at the site in the documented incident | Documented 2023-10-14 | Contested boundary / control uncertain | 2023-10-14 inspection, cited in 2026 judgment | Osijek Administrative Court, Us I-981/2025-13 |
Fenced Varosha, CyprusNoteThe UN distinguishes the fenced area from the Green Line. The Security Council calls for reversal of reopening steps taken since October 2020. | Turkish military control, with Turkish Cypriot authorities involved in reopenings | 1974 | Frozen / contested | June 2026 UN deployment context | UN Secretary-General, S/2026/550 and UNFICYP buffer-zone description Additional source |
Strovilia / Akyar liaison postNoteThe UN calls for restoration of the military situation that preceded 30 June 2000. The post is smaller than the wider village. | Turkish Cypriot security presence and restrictions on UNFICYP movement | 2000 | Frozen / contested | June to December 2025 reporting period | UN Secretary-General, S/2026/8 Additional source |
Kokkina / Erenköy, CyprusNoteDigitize the two ceasefire lines from the UN inset. The enclave is distinct from its supervised access arrangements. | Turkish Cypriot enclave, separated from the main northern zone | 1964 enclave, retained after 1974 | Frozen / contested | June 2026 UN map | UN Secretary-General, S/2026/550 map annex Additional source |
Pyla / Pile, CyprusNoteCivilian use and UN oversight coexist. Use the ceasefire lines and a village marker. | Mixed Greek and Turkish Cypriot village in UNFICYP buffer zone | Current ceasefire alignment 1974 | Frozen / buffer zone | UNFICYP live description checked 2026-11-11 | UNFICYP, About the buffer zone |
Artsvashen / BashkendNoteArmenian exclave within Azerbaijan. Armenia's prime minister said in September 2026 that there was no practical enclave settlement. | Azerbaijan | 1992 | Frozen / contested | 2025 survey and September 2026 status | CivilNet territorial survey Additional source |
Karki / TigranashenNoteAzerbaijani exclave within Armenia. Use the mapped Soviet-era enclave extent. | Armenia | 1990, per Azerbaijani MFA | Frozen / contested | 2025 survey and September 2026 status | CivilNet territorial survey Additional source |
Yukhari Askipara / Verin VoskeparNoteDistinct from the similarly named non-enclave village transferred to Azerbaijan in 2024. | Armenia | 1992, per Azerbaijani MFA | Frozen / contested | 2025 survey and September 2026 status | CivilNet territorial survey Additional source |
Barkhudarly and Sofulu enclaveNoteTwo settlements in one Azerbaijani enclave. Mark them as two points inside one polygon if scale allows. | Armenia | 1992, per Azerbaijani MFA | Frozen / contested | 2025 survey and September 2026 status | CivilNet territorial survey Additional source |
Cocieri, MoldovaNoteEast-bank village. Checkpoints and bridge access are distinct from municipal administration. | Moldovan local authority. Tiraspol affects road access. | Post-1992 arrangement | Frozen / contested access | 2026-01-21 government visit | Government of Moldova, Cocieri plateau visit Additional source |
Molovata Nouă, MoldovaNoteEast-bank village. The government's report names its mayor and requests unimpeded delivery routes. | Moldovan local authority. Tiraspol affects road access. | Post-1992 arrangement | Frozen / contested access | 2026-01-21 government visit | Government of Moldova, Cocieri plateau visit Additional source |
| Middle East and Africa: local sites · 27 | |||||
Northern Ghajar and adjacent area north of the Blue LineNoteThe UN identifies northern Ghajar and adjacent land north of the line. Southern Ghajar belongs in the Golan context. | Israel Defense Forces | 2006 reoccupation of northern sector | Contested / longstanding occupation | Through 2026-02-20, refresh for November | UN Secretary-General, S/2026/160, paragraph 24 |
Shebaa Farms / Shab'a FarmsNoteLebanon claims the farms. The UN used the Syrian-side alignment for the 2000 withdrawal determination, pending an agreed border. | Israel Defense Forces | 1967 | Contested / active frontier | UNIFIL observations through 2026-02-20 | UN Secretary-General, S/2026/160, paragraph 22 Additional source |
Kfar Shuba Hills, Lebanon–Syria–Golan interfaceNoteLebanon claims the hills. UNIFIL reports fire from the Shebaa area toward Kfar Shuba. This does not locate every position or imply control of Kfar Shuba village. | Israeli positions in the adjoining Shebaa area. Exact hill-sector footprint requires verification. | Since 1967 for adjoining occupied terrain | Contested / active frontier | UNIFIL observations through 2026-02-20 | UN Secretary-General, S/2026/160, paragraph 22 Additional source |
Heglig oil facility and immediate approaches, SudanNoteFacility protection and RSF control of surrounding territory and pipeline access are distinct. Refresh the facility guard deployment before print. | RSF captured the area. South Sudanese forces deployed to guard the facility under an agreement. | 2025-12-08 capture. Mid-December protection. | Active / overlapping authority | 2026-09-27 update on RSF transit tolls | EUAA Sudan Security Situation, West Kordofan Additional source |
Babanusa, West KordofanNoteThe captured city and 22nd Division base are distinguishable from the broader front. Refresh current control. | Rapid Support Forces in EUAA's period of reporting | 2025-12 | Active / dated control | July 2026 regional control assessment | EUAA Sudan Security Situation, West Kordofan |
Al Nuhud, West KordofanNoteCapture date refers to the city. Refresh current control. | Rapid Support Forces in EUAA's period of reporting | 2025-05 | Active / dated control | July 2026 regional control assessment | EUAA Sudan Security Situation, West Kordofan |
Al Khuwai, West KordofanNoteCapture date refers to the town. Refresh current control. | Rapid Support Forces in EUAA's period of reporting | 2025-05 | Active / dated control | July 2026 regional control assessment | EUAA Sudan Security Situation, West Kordofan |
Kafia Kingi / Hofrat en NahasNoteNearby RSF control in South Darfur cannot establish control of every part of Kafia Kingi. | Sudan and South Sudan claim the region. Current local force disposition unverified. | Independence-era dispute, 2011 | Contested | 2026 reporting on claim and adjoining territory | EUAA Sudan Security Situation, South Darfur Additional source |
Ras Doumeira and Doumeira IslandNoteThe headland, island and former peacekeeper positions require separate observation. The UN demanded withdrawal from the area of conflict in 2009. | Eritrean entry reported by Djibouti after Qatar's withdrawal. Current exact disposition unverified. | 2008 clash. 2017 reports of renewed presence. | Contested | BTI 2026 confirms unresolved dispute | BTI Djibouti country report Additional source |
Mbanié / MbañeNoteThe ICJ found the 1900 Convention is the applicable legal title for the islands in the dispute. It did not determine sovereignty in the operative ruling or report physical handover. | Last documented Gabonese possession. Transfer under the implementation process unverified here. | Gabonese seizure in 1972 | Contested / implementation | August 2026 implementation mechanism | ICJ judgment press release and Reuters historical possession Additional source |
Cocotiers / CocoterosNoteThe legal-title finding covers the islet. A physical-control label needs separate confirmation. | Physical administration unverified here | Dispute since at least 1972 | Contested / implementation | August 2026 implementation mechanism | ICJ judgment and implementation reporting Additional source |
CongaNoteThe legal-title finding covers the islet. A physical-control label needs separate confirmation. | Physical administration unverified here | Dispute since at least 1972 | Contested / implementation | August 2026 implementation mechanism | ICJ judgment and implementation reporting Additional source |
Peñón de Vélez de la Gomera / BadisNoteThe sand isthmus creates a short land border. Morocco claims the Spanish-held possession. | Spain | 1564 continuous Spanish rule | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | October 2026 reporting | SWI swissinfo.ch, Spanish–Moroccan boundary Additional source |
Alhucemas Islands / Al HoceimaNoteSpanish-held group claimed by Morocco. This date refers to the main Peñón. | Spain | Peñón since 1673 | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | September 2026 reporting | Observatorio de Ceuta y Melilla, Spanish military positions |
Chafarinas Islands / Iles JaafarinesNoteSpanish-held group claimed by Morocco. | Spain | 1848 | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | September 2026 reporting | Observatorio de Ceuta y Melilla, Spanish military positions |
Perejil / Leila IsletNoteSome Spanish reporting groups it with garrisoned possessions. A claim and routine nearby patrol do not prove sustained occupation. | Claimed by Spain and Morocco. No continuous garrison confirmed. | 2002 standoff and restoration of prior situation | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | 2026 reporting on continuing dispute | Diario AS, disputed possessions |
El Adde, GedoNoteThe source distinguishes this town and its surroundings from mixed rural areas elsewhere in Gedo. Refresh for November. | Al-Shabaab | Documented by 2025-03-31 | Active / dated control | 2026-03-31 control map | EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Gedo |
Cows Qurun, GedoNoteThe source distinguishes the town and its surroundings from mixed rural areas elsewhere in Gedo. Refresh for November. | Al-Shabaab | Documented by 2025-03-31 | Active / dated control | 2026-03-31 control map | EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Gedo |
Doolow, GedoNoteFederal, Jubbaland and allied foreign deployments vary by location. Do not extend town control across Gedo. | Jubbaland-aligned autonomous forces including allied units | Documented by 2025-03-31 | Active / dated control | 2026-03-31 control map | EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Gedo |
Luuq, GedoNoteThe prior-year map showed full Jubbaland control. Inter-clan fighting is a distinct issue. | Mixed Jubbaland and federal control | Changed between March 2025 and March 2026 | Active / contested | 2026-03-31 control map | EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Gedo |
Ceel Waaq / El Wak, GedoNoteThe prior-year map showed full Jubbaland control. Distinguish this town from the nearby Kenyan town. | Mixed Jubbaland and federal control | Changed between March 2025 and March 2026 | Active / contested | 2026-03-31 control map | EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Gedo |
Jamaame, Lower JubaNoteOther nearby areas had mixed control. Refresh for November. | Al-Shabaab | Documented by 2025-03-31 | Active / dated control | 2026-03-31 control map | EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Lower Juba |
Hagar, Lower JubaNoteTown-level assessment. Refresh for November. | Al-Shabaab | Documented by 2025-03-31 | Active / dated control | 2026-03-31 control map | EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Lower Juba |
Mido, Lower JubaNoteTown-level assessment. Refresh for November. | Al-Shabaab | Documented by 2025-03-31 | Active / dated control | 2026-03-31 control map | EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Lower Juba |
Berhani, Lower JubaNoteTown-level assessment. Refresh for November. | Al-Shabaab | Documented by 2025-03-31 | Active / dated control | 2026-03-31 control map | EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Lower Juba |
Badhaadhe, Lower JubaNoteTown-level assessment. Refresh for November. | Al-Shabaab | Documented by 2025-03-31 | Active / dated control | 2026-03-31 control map | EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Lower Juba |
Kismayo, Lower JubaNoteFederal member state authority with effective local security control. Its status differs from that of secessionist Somaliland. | Jubbaland authorities | Documented by 2025-03-31 | Contested federal relationship | 2026-03-31 control map | EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Lower Juba |
| Asia and the Americas: local sites · 16 | |||||
Kalapani–Lipulekh–LimpiyadhuraNoteRiver-source interpretations drive the competing claims. 1962 refers to the deployment at Kalapani. | India administers the disputed corridor. Nepal claims it. | Indian military presence at Kalapani since 1962 | Frozen / contested | June 2026 reporting | Al Jazeera, border explainer and map Additional source |
Susta riverine boundaryNoteReported incursion ended with withdrawal. Unmarked sectors and claims of land occupation lack a verified parcel inventory. | Nepali local administration with contested land use and reports of Indian encroachment | Longstanding. Narayani shifted in 1977. | Contested | 2026-06-12 patrol incident | Kathmandu Post, Susta field reporting Additional source |
Dongsha / Pratas IslandNotePRC claims and offshore patrols coexist with Taiwan's administration of the island. Pratas is outside the 70 tracker records. | Taiwan / Republic of China | Postwar ROC administration | Frozen / contested | 2026-08-18 patrol report | Taiwan Coast Guard Administration Additional source |
Sandy Cay / Pag-asa cays near ThituNoteVietnam also claims the cays. Sandy Cay is distinct from Vietnamese-held Sand Cay. | China reported landing and exercising control. The Philippines denied a seizure. Sustained possession unverified. | Competing reports in April 2025 | Contested / unverified | April 2025 incident | Philippine Presidential Communications Office Additional source |
Machias Seal IslandNoteThe land dispute is distinct from the offshore fisheries Grey Zone. Canadian government records confirm administration and the dispute. | Canada administers the sanctuary and lighthouse. United States also claims the island. | Lighthouse in operation since 1832 | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | Live administration page checked 2026-11-11 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, island sanctuary Additional source |
Navassa / La NavaseNoteFederal administration is clear despite the island's uninhabited status. | United States Fish and Wildlife Service administers the refuge. Haiti claims the island. | U.S. claim 1857. Refuge 1999. | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | 2026-05-06 refuge update | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Additional source |
Sapodilla Cayes / Cayos ZapotillosNoteThe ICJ's March 2026 judgment allowed Guatemala to intervene as a non-party. It did not settle title to the islands. | Belize administers the marine reserve. Honduras and Guatemala claim the cayes. | Belizean reserve declared 1996 | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | April 2026 ICJ proceedings and live fisheries page | Belize Fisheries Department, reserve and management Additional source |
Rincón de Artigas, Brazil–UruguayNoteUruguay expressly reserved its position over the wind project. The ministry's note is evidence of the claim rather than a mutually agreed boundary. | Brazil exercises administration. Uruguay disputes the boundary. | Longstanding. Uruguay's diplomatic note dates to 1988. | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | 2025 note and 2026 reporting | Uruguay Ministry of Foreign Affairs Additional source |
Isla Brasilera / Ilha BrasileiraNoteRiver island near the Cuareim–Uruguay confluence. This is separate from Rincón de Artigas. | Brazil. Uruguay disputes title. | Longstanding. Exact start of administration not established here. | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | 2026 reporting | El Observador, disputed border areas |
South GeorgiaNoteThe occupied 1982 period is historical. Argentina's claim persists. | United Kingdom. Argentina claims the island. | British dependencies framework 1908. UK restored control April 1982. | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | UK travel advice current September 2026 | UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Additional source |
South Sandwich IslandsNoteMap the separate island chain. The former Argentine Southern Thule station is historical. | United Kingdom. Argentina claims the islands. | British dependencies framework 1908. Argentine presence on Southern Thule ended in 1982. | Frozen / disputed sovereignty | UK travel advice current September 2026 | UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Additional source |
Cité Soleil, Port-au-PrinceNoteThe report describes competing turf and fractured alliances. A commune-wide single-actor fill would overstate the evidence. | Rival gang factions in different neighborhoods, with changes in security operations | Renewed fighting from March 2026 | Active / criminal governance | Through 2026-07-31 | UN Panel of Experts on Haiti, S/2026/714 Additional source |
Plaine du Cul-de-Sac, HaitiNoteThe report supports a zone of competition. Identify verified local boundaries separately. | Rival gang factions with changing local control | Renewed fighting from March 2026 | Active / criminal governance | Through 2026-07-31 | UN Panel of Experts on Haiti, S/2026/714 Additional source |
Mirebalais, HaitiNoteThe interim report names the town. The final report describes consolidated control in Centre and on border routes. | 400 Mawozo and Canaan gang network in the reported period | Documented by early 2026 | Active / criminal governance | First half of 2026. Refresh for November. | UN Panel of Experts on Haiti, S/2026/241 and S/2026/714 Additional source |
Saut-d'Eau, HaitiNoteThe interim report names the town. The final report describes consolidated control in Centre and on border routes. | 400 Mawozo and Canaan gang network in the reported period | Documented by early 2026 | Active / criminal governance | First half of 2026. Refresh for November. | UN Panel of Experts on Haiti, S/2026/241 and S/2026/714 Additional source |
Lower Artibonite, HaitiNoteAttack reports can direct a search for held locations. They do not identify a uniform actor across the department. | Gran Grif, Kokorat San Ras and Canaan in distinct localities | Documented expansion from March 2026 | Active / criminal governance | Through July 2026. Security forces deployed in August. | UN Panel of Experts on Haiti, S/2026/714 Additional source |
| South China Sea features · 70 | |||||
| Cuarteron Reef (Spratly Islands) | China | 1988 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-05-26 | CSIS AMTI |
| Fiery Cross Reef (Spratly Islands) | China | 1988 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2022-06-17 | CSIS AMTI |
| Gaven Reefs (Spratly Islands) | China | 1988 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2022-06-04 | CSIS AMTI |
| Hughes Reef (Spratly Islands) | China | 1988 | Frozen control / contested rights | Page 2026-10-29, image 2022-04-04 | CSIS AMTI |
| Johnson Reef (Spratly Islands) | China | 1988 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2017-07-10 | CSIS AMTI |
Mischief Reef (Spratly Islands)NoteChinese physical control dates to 1994 in AMTI's account. The 2016 tribunal placed the feature in the Philippine EEZ and continental shelf. | China | 1994 | Frozen control / contested rights | Page 2026-10-30, image 2020-04-23 | CSIS AMTI |
| Subi Reef (Spratly Islands) | China | 1988 | Frozen control / contested rights | Page 2026-10-30, image 2020-03-27 | CSIS AMTI |
Antelope Reef (Paracel Islands)NoteAugust 2026 imagery shows extensive new land and likely runway construction. The runway inference is AMTI's assessment. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-08-14, image 2026-08-14 | CSIS AMTI |
Bombay Reef (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2019-02-11, image 2017-09-11 | CSIS AMTI |
| Drummond Island (Paracel Islands) | China | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-06-23 | CSIS AMTI |
| Duncan Islands (Paracel Islands) | China | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-06-12 | CSIS AMTI |
Lincoln Island (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-06-16 | CSIS AMTI |
Middle Island (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2018-03-02, image 2017-12-26 | CSIS AMTI |
| Money Island (Paracel Islands) | China | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-06-12 | CSIS AMTI |
North Island (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2018-03-02, image 2017-12-26 | CSIS AMTI |
North Reef (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2019-02-06, image 2017-11-29 | CSIS AMTI |
Observation Bank (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2019-02-06, image 2017-09-12 | CSIS AMTI |
| Pattle Island (Paracel Islands) | China | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-06-12 | CSIS AMTI |
Quanfu Island (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2019-02-06, image 2017-10-29 | CSIS AMTI |
| Robert Island (Paracel Islands) | China | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2021-02-22, image 2017-12-10 | CSIS AMTI |
South Island (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2018-03-03, image 2017-12-26 | CSIS AMTI |
South Sand (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2019-02-06, image 2018-01-25 | CSIS AMTI |
Tree Island (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-06-20 | CSIS AMTI |
Triton Island (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2018-03-05, image 2017-10-27 | CSIS AMTI |
West Sand (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2018-03-02, image 2017-12-26 | CSIS AMTI |
| Woody Island (Paracel Islands) | China | 1955 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2022-06-16 | CSIS AMTI |
Yagong Island (Paracel Islands)NoteChina consolidated control of the Paracel group in 1974. The individual site establishment date is unspecified. | China | 1974 (group control) | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2019-02-06, image 2017-09-29 | CSIS AMTI |
Scarborough Shoal (Scarborough Shoal)NoteChina maintains the predominant coast guard presence. The July 2026 AIS study also documents Philippine patrols and temporary structures. | China | 2012 | Contested access | Page 2026-01-15, image 2016-10-29 | CSIS AMTI |
| Ardasier Reef (Spratly Islands) | Malaysia | 1986 | Frozen control / contested rights | Page 2026-10-30, image 2017-04-02 | CSIS AMTI |
| Erica Reef (Spratly Islands) | Malaysia | 1999 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-30, image 2017-06-29 | CSIS AMTI |
| Investigator Shoal (Spratly Islands) | Malaysia | 1999 | Frozen control / contested rights | Page 2026-10-30, image 2017-03-31 | CSIS AMTI |
| Mariveles Reef (Spratly Islands) | Malaysia | 1986 | Frozen control / contested rights | Page 2026-10-30, image 2017-12-15 | CSIS AMTI |
| Swallow Reef (Spratly Islands) | Malaysia | 1983 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-30, image 2017-11-25 | CSIS AMTI |
| Commodore Reef (Spratly Islands) | Philippines | 1978 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-06-16 | CSIS AMTI |
| Flat Island (Spratly Islands) | Philippines | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2018-03-05, image 2018-01-01 | CSIS AMTI |
| Loaita Cay (Spratly Islands) | Philippines | 1978 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-04-20 | CSIS AMTI |
| Loaita Island (Spratly Islands) | Philippines | 1978 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-04-20 | CSIS AMTI |
| Nanshan Island (Spratly Islands) | Philippines | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-04-20 | CSIS AMTI |
| Northeast Cay (Spratly Islands) | Philippines | 1968 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2018-02-28, image 2017-12-01 | CSIS AMTI |
Second Thomas Shoal (Spratly Islands)NoteThe Philippines maintains the BRP Sierra Madre outpost. The 2016 tribunal treated the shoal as a low-tide elevation in the Philippine EEZ. | Philippines | 1999 | Contested access | Page 2023-10-12, image 2017-09-28 | CSIS AMTI |
| Thitu Island (Spratly Islands) | Philippines | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2022-04-04 | CSIS AMTI |
| West York Island (Spratly Islands) | Philippines | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2022-07-08, image 2022-03-07 | CSIS AMTI |
| Itu Aba Island (Spratly Islands) | Taiwan | 1956 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-30, image 2018-01-08 | CSIS AMTI |
| Alison Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1988 | Frozen control / contested rights | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-06-02 | CSIS AMTI |
| Amboyna Cay (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1978 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-07-06 | CSIS AMTI |
| Barque Canada Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1987 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-08-01 | CSIS AMTI |
| Central Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1978 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-06-10 | CSIS AMTI |
| Collins Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1988 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-08-07 | CSIS AMTI |
Cornwallis South Reef (Spratly Islands)NoteAMTI records two confirmed outposts and two whose status is unclear. This row represents one reef. | Vietnam | 1988 | Frozen control / contested rights | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-07-28 | CSIS AMTI |
| Discovery Great Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1988 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-07-21 | CSIS AMTI |
| East Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1988 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2021-05-22 | CSIS AMTI |
| Grierson Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1978 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2026-03-05 | CSIS AMTI |
| Ladd Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1988 | Frozen control / contested rights | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-07-07 | CSIS AMTI |
| Lansdowne Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1988 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2026-03-12 | CSIS AMTI |
| Namyit Island (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1973 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2024-05-16 | CSIS AMTI |
Pearson Reef (Spratly Islands)NoteAMTI's Vietnam index and the feature description identify Vietnam. The feature page's Occupied by field repeats the reef's name. | Vietnam | 1978 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-08-01 | CSIS AMTI |
| Petley Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1988 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2026-04-10 | CSIS AMTI |
Sand Cay (Spratly Islands)NoteVietnam-held Sand Cay is distinct from Sandy Cay near Thitu Island. | Vietnam | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-08-09 | CSIS AMTI |
| Sin Cowe Island (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2022-01-09 | CSIS AMTI |
| South Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1988 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2026-03-05 | CSIS AMTI |
| Southwest Cay (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1975 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2022-01-06 | CSIS AMTI |
| Spratly Island (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2020-06-06 | CSIS AMTI |
| Tennent Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1974 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-07-10 | CSIS AMTI |
| West Reef (Spratly Islands) | Vietnam | 1987 | Frozen control / contested sovereignty | Page 2026-10-29, image 2025-08-09 | CSIS AMTI |
Alexandra Bank (DK1 banks)NoteVietnamese DK1 facilities on a submerged bank. AMTI treats DK1 banks as distinct from the Spratly island group in Vietnam's position. | Vietnam | 1991 | Frozen platform presence | Page 2018-03-05, image 2017-10-07 | CSIS AMTI |
Grainger Bank (DK1 banks)NoteVietnamese DK1 facilities on a submerged bank. AMTI treats DK1 banks as distinct from the Spratly island group in Vietnam's position. | Vietnam | 1991 | Frozen platform presence | Page 2022-04-04, image 2018-05-19 | CSIS AMTI |
Prince Consort Bank (DK1 banks)NoteVietnamese DK1 facilities on a submerged bank. AMTI treats DK1 banks as distinct from the Spratly island group in Vietnam's position. | Vietnam | Start unreported | Frozen platform presence | Page 2023-04-06, image 2017-08-07 | CSIS AMTI |
Prince of Wales Bank (DK1 banks)NoteVietnamese DK1 facilities on a submerged bank. AMTI treats DK1 banks as distinct from the Spratly island group in Vietnam's position. | Vietnam | Start unreported | Frozen platform presence | Page 2018-03-05, image 2017-10-10 | CSIS AMTI |
Rifleman Bank (DK1 banks)NoteVietnamese DK1 facilities on a submerged bank. AMTI treats DK1 banks as distinct from the Spratly island group in Vietnam's position. | Vietnam | Start unreported | Frozen platform presence | Page 2024-09-25, image 2017-04-03 | CSIS AMTI |
Vanguard Bank (DK1 banks)NoteVietnamese DK1 facilities on a submerged bank. AMTI treats DK1 banks as distinct from the Spratly island group in Vietnam's position. | Vietnam | Start unreported | Frozen platform presence | Page 2018-03-05, image 2017-11-15 | CSIS AMTI |
| Under review, not yet on the print · 10 | |||||
Cabo Delgado in MozambiqueNoteActivity across nine districts identifies the conflict’s reach. Assess held sites within the districts individually. | Islamic State Mozambique in operational areas and temporary holds. State and allied forces elsewhere. | Insurgency since 2017. Local control varies. | Active. Durable area control unverified. | Oct 2026 activity | ACLED Mozambique Conflict Monitor |
Anglophone CameroonNoteWar Watch documents armed conflict and evaluates territorial control under an international humanitarian law threshold. A coherent separatist polygon remains unverified. | Ambazonian separatist factions and Cameroon’s state forces | Armed conflict since 2017. Local dates vary. | Active. Territorial extent unverified. | 2026 classification | Geneva Academy War Watch |
Central African Republic rebel localitiesNoteConfirm smaller rebel controlled or contested localities using current reporting. Older broad rebel outlines predate government gains. | Rival rebel and militia groups in some rural localities. State forces regained many towns. | Repeated changes since 2013. Government advances from 2021. | Active and contested | Retrospective reporting in BTI 2026 | BTI 2026 Central African Republic report |
Other eastern DR Congo armed group areasNoteIdentify local held sites independently of attack locations. The briefing addresses civilian threats and negotiations alongside territorial issues. | Allied Democratic Forces and other local militias have operational areas and some local authority | Local dates vary | Active. Territorial extent unverified. | 2026 MONUSCO briefing | UN MONUSCO briefing |
Northwestern Nigeria bandit localitiesNoteConfirm local governance and access separately. The national source describes widespread activity and lacks control outlines. | Armed bandit groups exercise coercion at local scale | Local dates vary | Active. Territorial extent unverified. | Live country overview | ACLED Nigeria overview |
Southern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa former FATA and BalochistanNoteACLED reports roadblocks and patrols while distinguishing them from durable control. EUAA documents shadow governance in parts of North Waziristan. Use activity or influence symbols for the areas described. | TTP exercises shadow administration and coercion in parts of KP. Baloch insurgents operate in separate areas. | TTP resurgence after 2021. Local dates vary. | Active. Territorial extent unverified. | ACLED evidence through Sep 2025. EUAA update in 2026. | ACLED TTP borderlands assessment EUAA armed actors |
Papua in IndonesiaNoteMining influence and local armed incidents support points or a dated contested zone where there is evidence. Continuous rebel boundaries remain unverified. | TPNPB insurgents operate in parts of the central and highland regions. Indonesia maintains state forces. | Longstanding insurgency. Escalated in 2026. | Active. Territorial extent unverified. | May 2026 incident reporting | ACLED Asia Pacific overview |
Philippines insurgent localitiesNoteClashes and remnant cells support an activity layer. Confirm any local sustained control with separate evidence. | NPA and remaining jihadist cells in distinct areas | Longstanding. Residual activity in 2026. | Active. Durable area control unverified. | 2026 reporting | ACLED Asia Pacific overview RSIS Philippines assessment |
Ecuador gang neighborhoods and prisonsNoteEvidence supports local turf and prison governance research. Verify more recent control before drawing individual neighborhoods or facilities. | Competing criminal groups and state security forces | Local dates vary | Active and contested | Late 2025 outlook for 2026 | ACLED Ecuador assessment |
Sarstoon River and islandNotePlot reported incidents and competing claims. Mainland administration remains a distinct issue. | Belizean and Guatemalan forces contest patrol access | Longstanding boundary dispute. New incidents in 2026. | Contested access | Sep and Nov 2026 incidents | Commonwealth statement La Hora incident reporting |
205 records plus 10 under review, research cutoff 11 Nov 2026. Physical control, legal claims and military presence are recorded separately, because holding a place is not the same as owning it. Evidence dates vary by record, and active front lines are re-checked before each print.
Sources
Three labels
- Sourced fact
- Calculation
- Judgment
- CSIS AMTI Island Tracker · one page per South China Sea feature, linked in the Data tab
- South China Sea arbitral award (2016)
- ACLED Asia Pacific overview
- ACLED Asia Pacific overview
- ACLED Ecuador assessment
- ACLED JNIM profile
- ACLED Mozambique Conflict Monitor
- ACLED Myanmar outlook
- ACLED Nigeria overview
- ACLED Sahel updates
- ACLED TTP borderlands assessment
- ACLED Zawiya assessment
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Additional source
- Al Jazeera, border explainer and map
- AP battlefield reporting
- AP via Washington Post
- Belize Fisheries Department, reserve and management
- BINUH quarterly findings
- Breaking Defense handover assessment
- BTI 2026 Central African Republic report
- BTI Djibouti country report
- Cambodian letter circulated at UN
- CFR border chronology
- CFR Ethiopia tracker
- CFR India Pakistan tracker and map
- Chatham House border study
- Chinese MFA talks outcomes
- CivilNet territorial survey
- CNES geographic assessment
- Commonwealth statement
- Council of the EU Georgia policy
- Council of the EU statement
- CRS Ethiopia assessment
- CRS Lebanon assessment
- CRS Libya assessment
- CRS naval station and lease
- CRS South China Sea assessment
- CRS Taiwan background
- Diario AS, disputed possessions
- DVB counteroffensive reporting
- El País, border town and Portuguese claim
- Environment and Climate Change Canada, island sanctuary
- EU relations assessment
- EUAA Abyei actors
- EUAA Al Shabaab control and influence
- EUAA and UN areas of influence
- EUAA armed actors
- EUAA eastern control assessment
- EUAA ELN in Venezuela
- EUAA FARC dissidents
- EUAA Gedaref update
- EUAA main areas of dispute
- EUAA Nigerian armed actors
- EUAA Quneitra control
- EUAA Red Sea control
- EUAA SDF territorial control
- EUAA Somalia control maps
- EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Gedo
- EUAA Somalia Security Situation, Lower Juba
- EUAA Sudan control map
- EUAA Sudan Security Situation, South Darfur
- EUAA Sudan Security Situation, West Kordofan
- EUAA Sweida control
- EUAA Venezuela mining security
- FEWS NET outlook
- Fogo Cruzado methods and results
- French Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- Geneva Academy War Watch
- GENI and Fogo Cruzado map update
- Government of Moldova, Cocieri plateau visit
- Guyana government summary of ICJ measures
- Guyana government summary of ICJ submissions
- Guyana Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- IACHR and REDESCA statement
- ICJ judgment press release and Reuters historical possession
- Indian government WMCC account
- Initialed Armenia Azerbaijan agreement
- International Crisis Group Sinaloa report
- ISP Myanmar parallel administrations
- ISP Myanmar Wa administration
- ISW assessment via Kyiv Post
- ISW map room
- ISW terrain assessment
- Japanese government statement
- Japanese MFA Northern Territories
- Japanese MFA Senkaku administration
- Kathmandu Post, Susta field reporting
- La Hora incident reporting
- Moldova Joint Control Commission account
- Myanmar Peace Monitor town recaptures
- National Geographic map policy
- NATO role in Kosovo
- OCHA situation report
- OSCE Mission to Moldova
- Osijek Administrative Court, Us I-981/2025-13
- Philippine Presidential Communications Office
- Reuters Feb account
- Reuters Oct update
- Reuters on ceasefire and control
- Reuters on competing accounts
- Reuters recognition report
- ROK MFA administration
- ROK MFA residents and staff
- RSIS Philippines assessment
- Security Council Report
- Security Council Report
- SOS Orinoco study
- SWI swissinfo.ch, Spanish–Moroccan boundary
- TAAF administration
- Taiwan Coast Guard Administration
- The Diplomat border reporting
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- UK FCDO DR Congo advice
- UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
- UK Home Office Ethiopia assessment
- UK Parliament Ceuta briefing
- UK Parliament Chagos and international law
- UK Parliament Falkland Islands briefing
- UK Parliament Yemen briefing
- UN Command DMZ fact sheet
- UN Commission of Inquiry
- UN decolonization profile
- UN Falkland Islands profile
- UN list of Non Self Governing Territories
- UN MONUSCO briefing
- UN OCHA West Bank access map
- UN panel report S/2026/714
- UN Secretary-General, S/2026/160, paragraph 24
- UN Secretary-General, S/2026/550 and UNFICYP buffer-zone description
- UN Secretary-General, S/2026/8
- UN Security Council Resolution 2790
- UN Security Council Resolution 2815
- UNFICYP buffer geography
- Uruguay Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- US State Department Karakoram advisory
What changed since the print
- [DATE][What changed, one line][Source link]
- [DATE][What changed, one line][Source link]
Buy the print
As of: [DATE]
Edition: [YEAR]
Size: 36 × 24 in
Price: [YOUR PRICE]
Cite this map
Castellan Supply Co. Lines of Control. As of [DATE]. castellansupply.com/maps/lines-of-control/